padgift.blogg.se

Abacus bank case
Abacus bank case




  1. #ABACUS BANK CASE MOVIE#
  2. #ABACUS BANK CASE TRIAL#

who had investigated the fraud with the big banks, as if to say, “Here we are.

abacus bank case

He had all these federal investigators from D.C. It began with Vance standing before the reporters. I think when you look at that indictment, it was designed to attract the press and be a spectacle.

#ABACUS BANK CASE TRIAL#

It came after the trial and we were able to include that throughout the whole film.įrom left: Jill Sung, Vera Sung and Thomas Sung in 'Abacus: Small Enough to Jail' directed by Steve James.Ī startling moment is when the Sungs and their employees are subjected to a perp walk. They felt strongly they were innocent, even when we said we would make a real effort to present the case against them if we could get cooperation from the DA’s office. That came through for me loud and clear, and they weren’t afraid of having us tell their story.

abacus bank case

I believed them to be people of principle and courage and integrity. When I went to New York to film the family, I was just really taken with them. There was an occasional article here and there during the three years between the indictment and the end of the trial, so it seemed pretty important. The New York Times, even The Wall Street Journal wasn’t covering it. That alone was intriguing and no one was covering it. Mark called me and told me the broad details of what had happened - how they discovered the fraud themselves and cooperated, and this is what they were rewarded with, the prosecution. Mark started to look into it and realized they were the only bank being criminally prosecuted connected to the 2008 financial crisis, which Vance clearly connected it to and steadfastly maintains today. They talked to him about what was happening and this trial that they were going to go to, and they couldn’t believe it. I got involved because producer Mark Mitten had known the family for a decade and is friends with them. How did you get involved with the project? This film and its subject seems to be a departure for you. James talked with MarketWatch about “Abacus.” The documentary follows the events of the trial, and includes interviews with lawyers from the prosecution and defense, jurors, journalists, and most of all, the Sungs themselves. bank to have been prosecuted in connection to the 2008 financial crisis. indicted Abacus on charges of a scheme to falsify loan applications to Fannie Mae, and subjected the Sungs and their employees to a public “chain gang,” forced to walk into the courtroom handcuffed in front of the cameras. In 2012, Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance, Jr. The Sungs’ actions resulted in an investigation of the bank itself, and its leaders. He was promptly fired, and the Sungs - Thomas’s daughters Jill and Vera help run the bank - reported the incident to Fannie Mae, referred the case to the FBI and hired an investigator to root out any more wrongdoing. Lewis Rosenberg is of counsel to Ginarte Gallardo Gonzalez Winograd.But in 2009, a loan officer named Ken Yu was found to have falsified documents and accepted bribes by borrowers, setting off the Sungs’ suspicions. It seems a first-year law student, even before attending an ethics class, would realize the appearance of impropriety his actions presented, again demonstrating a lack of basic prosecutorial judgment. To his credit, Vance submitted this ethical question to a Columbia Law School body and in January announced a policy of no longer accepting contributions from lawyers whose clients are subject to prosecution by his office. Weinstein was also the subject of a recent Frontline documentary film.

#ABACUS BANK CASE MOVIE#

Vance, you may recall, suffered other embarrassment when it was disclosed before the election that he had accepted $50,000 for his campaign from movie producer Harvey Weinstein’s lawyers and of course failed to press sex offense charges against him. Although all of the dozens of counts charged were either dismissed by the judge or denied by the jury, which finding Abacus entirely not guilty, the D.A, ignoring the presumption of innocence, insists that Abacus was not found innocent but only not guilty.






Abacus bank case